Monday, November 4, 2013

Chinese Citizens Develop Online Code Bypassing Censorship

While China’s “Great Firewall” of internet censorship is often criticized as being undemocratic and grossly ubiquitous, there is actually an online code being developed by Chinese citizens that not only bypasses regulators, but creates new conceptions of news and community. This code has created a subtle compromise between the Chinese public and its government – between the people’s need for expression and the government’s need for control.

Xiao Qiang, editor of the
China Digital Times
NPR recently unveiled the reality of the code through an interview with Xiao Qiang, the editor of the China Digital Times. Qiang described the phenomenon as the creation of a “public” code, not a “secret” code. For instance, “May 35” is code for June 4, the day of the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre, yet the code is commonly understood by both the government and the public to mean just that. It is no secret at all. In fact, the coding is so universal that it is rather not a code at all; it is an online language.

Consequently, political criticism is often present on Chinese servers because it passes through surveillance by being indirect. This indirectness is the compromising factor between the Chinese public and government. As long as the commentary is technically ambiguous, and balancing the fine line, the government does not censor it. Allowing some leniency helps the regime stay in control by letting its citizens express grievances in non-violent ways. Above all, China does not want protests. What is targeted the most under the “Great Firewall” is any text indicating a call to action.

This disrupts traditional methods of community building whereby a mass message about a problem is sent out, and then alike individuals gather together in person to solve it. However, it reversely creates a new version of community building by which people meet on the web to discuss their problems. They even discuss those problems through a new language, which they add on to through the endless interactivity that web communication offers.

The creation of the online community also establishes a news hub which is an alternative to the propaganda inflicted news of the government. Citizens can now perceive two different stories, one of which is given validity by the cultivation of multiple accounts online.

Nevertheless, while NPR provides an insider’s view on Chinese internet regulation, other reports such as an article titled “Crackdown on Bloggers Is Mounted by China” describe a far more restrictive situation. While user-generated opinion is growing more powerful, bloggers still have to be careful as government officials can detain offenders for “malicious rumor-mongering online.” So for now, balancing the fine line may not be as common, or easy, as some testimonies might suggest.

Sources:
Related Sources:

2 comments:

  1. Your point about the creation of alternative means of circumventing Chinese government censorship is not only informative, but raises many other issues from a mass communications standpoint. With these workarounds creating new ways of community building online, how does the Chinese government-approved material compare? Because the “Great Firewall” is so stringent, it is much more likely for there to be a greater concentration of government-approved information online than that stemming from the more user-generated outlets. Also, since the information code originally created to circumvent the firewall is now reasonably common knowledge, has the government been able to apprehend offenders more easily as they figure out more and more of this coded language?

    ReplyDelete
  2. This seems like a very ambiguous and arbitrary fine line. If I were a Chinese citizen who was considering posting possibly offensive or inciting material, I would be very worried. Instead of simply cutting off access to sites where this material may be posted, they open it up to users, yet threaten discipline if they are unsatisfied with what is being posted. This is a very arbitrary line that seems to diminish the purpose of allowing this "public code." Although it does redefine the conceptions of news and community, it doesn't appear to carry the possibility of the same effect as other countries. When unfavorable speech is censored, it defeats the purpose of allowing access to these sites.

    ReplyDelete