Showing posts with label Globalization. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Globalization. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 26, 2013

Exploring Mass Communication Abroad: An Overview of Our Findings

      


      At the conclusion of our findings, several consistent themes arose; agenda setting, political controversy, and globalization. These themes are all interconnected and were prominently found in our analysis of advertising, news, and film in both the United States and abroad. Agenda setting and political controversy were the most common and reoccurring themes. In Caroline’s post regarding Bassem Youssef’s freedom of expression in Egypt, she concluded that there is both agenda setting among the Egyption media and the coverage of the issue from American media. While Youssef was censored and shut down by Egyptian media outlet, CBC, he was supported by American media organizations such as the Washington Post and CNN. The CBC was attempting to perpetuate their agenda of promoting moral and societal values, while the U.S. outlets were encouraging the value of free speech.



      The next theme of political controversy was closely linked to that of agenda setting. In that media outlets in different countries have their own specific agenda to promote, they often instigate political controversy. Ned concluded in his analysis of Venezuelan and U.S. newspapers that nationalistic tones created political controversy. For instance, Venezuelan newspaper Correo del Orinoco boldly and viciously accused the U.S. of prohibiting the U.S. of airspace for President Nicolas Maduro. They described the U.S. as an unreasonable power only yearning to flex their muscle. Yet, The New York Times vehemently refuted that accusation, calling it “absurd,” and painted the Venezuelan leader and government as irrational and vitriolic. The nationalistic tones and language created political controversy among the two countries.

      Finally, we identified the persistent theme of globalization. In Coca-Col-ization: How Coca-Cola Advertising Embodies Glocalization, Sarah identified glocalization as the “connection of many cultures that forces the homogenization of all cultures,” while glocalization ensures that the products and idea are customized to suit certain cultures. Yet, on the other hand, cultural imperialism is an example of negative aspects of globalization. As Todd Gitlin notes “if the American culture industry has long depended on American formulas: Westerns, action heroes, rock music, hip-hop. Globalized distribution expedites imitation. The American way generates proven results,” (Gitlin, 182). As Amy notes, Hollywood “charisma men” in Japanese commercials perpetuate the idea of the imperialism of American culture. The romanticized exoticism associated with the Western man is shown through Japanese commercials and imposes the cultural “ideals” of American culture. Furthermore, the economic power of the United States contributes to the cultural imperialism of other countries. Although the film industry of India, Bollywood has seen astounding success, the monetary supremacy of the U.S. has in many ways proven too difficult of an obstacle to overcome. Consequently, U.S. film is still considered a dominant cultural power affecting countries across the globe. the world.
      We have thoroughly enjoyed contributing to this blog. Through doing this, we have learned how important media literacy is to understanding the different sides of an issue as well as how vital it is to interrupting the agendas of those sides. We encourage the readers of our blog to be willing to be critical of media both in the United States and abroad. 

Tuesday, November 19, 2013

Hollywood vs. Bollywood: An Even Playing Field?




When one mentions Bollywood, to most people, the first and sometimes only thought that comes to mind is the sensational film, Slumdog Millionaire. However, India has realized and capitalized on a wildly successful industry that exports more films than the U.S. In fact, India exports on average 1000 films a year to a worldwide audience of over 3 billion, compared to the United States’ 500 films and 2.6 billion people respectively. Our world can be considered both a “global village” and a globalized economy, which refers to “the growing dominance of western forms of political, economic, and cultural life.” Although this has helped Bollywood thrive, it has also shaped the industry and created competition.

But has globalization also made for an uneven playing field?



Globalization has allowed the United States to take full advantage of the advancements in both technology and capitalism, evident by the $60 million average that the film industry spends to produce a movie. Comparatively, Bollywood only spends around $5 million per film. Furthermore, 50% of the movies produced by Bollywood are never released, and of those that are, 95% result in losses. Moreover, America’s dominance and wealth has afforded them the ability to offer filmmakers tax credits and subsidies. Michael Cieply of The New York Times examined this aspect of the film industry and notes that states will offer film producers astounding tax credits to shoot the movie in that state. The Texas Film Commission states that movie companies can receive 5%-22.5% in tax credits in Texas, based on how much they spend. Additionally, ticket prices in India go for $1 on average, compared to $8.38 in the U.S. The Indian film industry will have a very difficult time competing with these incentives. They are not afforded tax credits, and due to the high-risk environment, cannot spend $100 million on a movie like U.S. productions can.


Yet, Michael Schuman of Time notes that the world is now turning the tables, with many countries such as China and India exporting their goods. He states that although, in the past, globalization was a one-way street, “it is knitting together a society that, more than ever, is truly global.” Whereas developed nations were solely exporting to developing ones, countries such as the U.S. are now consuming those nations’ goods.

So, has globalization been advantageous or detrimental to Bollywood?


Although globalization has given countries such as India a worldwide market to consume their movies, it has also afforded the United States the ability to hand out subsidies to film producers, once again destabilizing the playing field.

Sources


Monday, November 4, 2013

Civil War and Chemical Weapons in Syria

Who cares about Syria?
Currently there are deadly civil wars raging throughout the country of Syria with no one solution to the problem. Syrian leader Assad has used chemical weapons over the course of these wars, which has led to discussion of possible military action from other countries.
To be fair, a lot of people worldwide are making Syrian civil wars a major priority, but the issue in the United States is examined very differently than it is in major global news outlets.

Syria in US-based News: CNN


This CNN video is from November 1 and details some of the present issues in the country. However, while Syria is the first issue mentioned, it is given only a minute of coverage in a ten-minute long video that covers everything from airline regulations to daylight savings time.


On the "World News" section of CNN's website (shown above in a screenshot), there is no mention of Syria whatsoever, even if you scroll down the entire page. Instead, the webpage is taken up by a variety of catchy headlines and entertainment news, such as "Do you know your sharks?" and "Doctor gives free surgeries". To find any information about Syria, it becomes necessary to search "syria" on the website and sift through the 11,975 results for recent and relevant articles.

Syria in Global News: Al Jazeera



In contrast to the brief mentions of Syria on CNN, the global news outlet Al Jazeera not only publishes constantly updated news  on the Syrian conflict and chemical weapons issue, but also created a separate news section for Syria, shown above. Articles covering such issues as the rising death rate of journalists in Syria (17 have died in the Syrian conflict in 2013 alone) and potential peace conferences, as well as more in-depth niche interest pieces such as religious minorities in the civil war. Al Jazeera doesn't just have articles about the myriad of issues in Syria, the news outlet has made strides towards entirely complete coverage so detailed as to merit a separate section that even has its own stylized header.

Comparison

The CNN website demonstrates a common principle in news media that seems to be especially present in the United States- news as entertainment and entertainment as news. We in America constantly demand more from our news. We don't want long articles, we want short, concise lists. We don't want to read anything at all, we want a video to talk to us. We don't want the video to talk for too long, we want a new topic every minute or two. We don't want just a talking video, we want an entertaining video. The cycle goes on and on, and as an American-based corporation, CNN dutifully fulfills the wishes of its consumers by featuring those news items that have the highest entertainment value and the greatest likelihood of being clicked on and shared around the web..

Al Jazeera uses some of these techniques, but its primary form of news distribution is traditional, long form articles. This may very well be on its way out of fashion and Al Jazeera is likely to follow this trend, but its current coverage is very different than CNN's. Short videos are included occasionally in news coverage, but they are almost exclusively news anchors and lack the pizzazz of other news outlets. Instead, visual elements are used to great effect in terms of dymanic pictures and news articles are comprehensive and well-researched. There is little to no element of "infotainment", which helps to emphasize the serious and dire nature of many of the news items that are discussed in the articles.

Sources

Saving Syria: Assessing Options for Regime Change
CNN Student News 
Syria: Too Dangerous to Cover?
The Scramble for Geneva II
Syria's Minorities: Caught in the Middle?
Privacy and Attention Span
C

Monday, October 28, 2013

Hollywood "Charisma Men" in Japanese Commericals

The appearance of male Hollywood stars in Japanese commercials involves more than famous buzz words such as American cultural imperialism and globalization. It is instead more closely an effect of:
  1. A negative stigma within the United States that looks down on Hollywood actors who take jobs for TV advertising. (i.e. Hollywood/film is high-brow and should not mix with low-brow televisual content.)
  2. A romanticized exoticism associated with the Western man.
In Japan, unlike the United States, celebrity appearances in commercials work to promote fame rather than stain it. Japanese companies put forth an agenda of associating stars with brands in order to sell products based on celebrity fandoms. This is true to an extent in the United States, as some stars will do big budget commercials for events such as the Super Bowl, but no one sees a blockbuster star starring in an ordinary coffee commercial among the majority of the American media landscape. However, one can certainly see it in Japan as Tommy Lee Jones has become grounded as the symbol of Boss coffee.

 

Therefore, why are Hollywood actors, such as Tommy Lee Jones, George Clooney, and Harrison Ford, taking face-time in Japanese commercials despite the negative stigma?

The answer is money – the bottom line. They can make a lot of money because the stigma is not in Japan. Even Dennis Hopper commented to Entertainment Weekly, “I couldn’t believe the money they were paying me. If I could do one of these every year, I could retire.” They also do it because the likelihood of the commercials becoming vastly visible in the U.S. is small. After all, media tend to go out of America, not in it.

Furthermore, the big money given to these male superstars is mostly for their exoticism as “Charisma Men.” “Charisma Man” is a stereotype in Japan that assumes Western men are more charming, doting, and easygoing than Japanese men, and it is both originated and perpetuated by the frequent Hollywood male presence within Japanese channels. The result is that Japanese women get to utilize media to fawn over actors like George Clooney, while Japanese men are left with a cultivated ideal that they may see as either competition or normative.

Sources:

Coca-Col-ization: How Coca-Cola Advertising Embodies Glocalization

Yes, you read it right.

Glocalization is a more precise term for the its well-known counterpart, globalization. Before discussing its use in Coca-Cola's advertising, there's a distinction to understand:

  
   






A perfect example of a company harnessing glocalization to advertise to a huge, diverse audience is The Coca-Cola Company.


Check out this Coca-Cola advertisement from their Happiness Without Borders campaign:

by The Coca-Cola Company

The video exemplifies both specific trends of effective mass communication and the social process glocalization.

Mass Communication Trends & Effects:                                                               
  • Political controversy
    • Audiences like conflict. It’s interesting.
    • Here, the ad portrays Coca-Cola as a global product that may solve tension between India and Pakistan. 
  • Agenda-setting
    • The media’s ability to influence what publics think about
    • In this case, shedding light on the conflict.
  • CNN Effect
    • The ability, through emotional video, to elevate distant issues on the domestic public agenda
    • Because of the footage in the ad, viewers worldwide feel sympathetic and action-minded toward the situation.


Glocalization:
  • By placing the "Small World Machine" in a rural environment, the technology is exciting and novel. So, Coke extends that global image in a local setting. 
  • The theme of the video also corresponds with Coca-Cola's ad campaign: "Open Happiness."
Final five seconds of "Coca-Cola Small World Machines"


While Coca-Cola narrowed the content to fit local groups, their "happy" brand remains potent. From individuals drinking Cokes and laughing to the final slogan, neither the American brand nor the locals completely conformed to the other's culture. 

Instead, Coca-Cola combined the local culture with its global trademark and created a perfect example of glocalization in mass communication. 



Check out the full sources for more info.