Showing posts with label Political Controversy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Political Controversy. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 26, 2013

Exploring Mass Communication Abroad: An Overview of Our Findings

      


      At the conclusion of our findings, several consistent themes arose; agenda setting, political controversy, and globalization. These themes are all interconnected and were prominently found in our analysis of advertising, news, and film in both the United States and abroad. Agenda setting and political controversy were the most common and reoccurring themes. In Caroline’s post regarding Bassem Youssef’s freedom of expression in Egypt, she concluded that there is both agenda setting among the Egyption media and the coverage of the issue from American media. While Youssef was censored and shut down by Egyptian media outlet, CBC, he was supported by American media organizations such as the Washington Post and CNN. The CBC was attempting to perpetuate their agenda of promoting moral and societal values, while the U.S. outlets were encouraging the value of free speech.



      The next theme of political controversy was closely linked to that of agenda setting. In that media outlets in different countries have their own specific agenda to promote, they often instigate political controversy. Ned concluded in his analysis of Venezuelan and U.S. newspapers that nationalistic tones created political controversy. For instance, Venezuelan newspaper Correo del Orinoco boldly and viciously accused the U.S. of prohibiting the U.S. of airspace for President Nicolas Maduro. They described the U.S. as an unreasonable power only yearning to flex their muscle. Yet, The New York Times vehemently refuted that accusation, calling it “absurd,” and painted the Venezuelan leader and government as irrational and vitriolic. The nationalistic tones and language created political controversy among the two countries.

      Finally, we identified the persistent theme of globalization. In Coca-Col-ization: How Coca-Cola Advertising Embodies Glocalization, Sarah identified glocalization as the “connection of many cultures that forces the homogenization of all cultures,” while glocalization ensures that the products and idea are customized to suit certain cultures. Yet, on the other hand, cultural imperialism is an example of negative aspects of globalization. As Todd Gitlin notes “if the American culture industry has long depended on American formulas: Westerns, action heroes, rock music, hip-hop. Globalized distribution expedites imitation. The American way generates proven results,” (Gitlin, 182). As Amy notes, Hollywood “charisma men” in Japanese commercials perpetuate the idea of the imperialism of American culture. The romanticized exoticism associated with the Western man is shown through Japanese commercials and imposes the cultural “ideals” of American culture. Furthermore, the economic power of the United States contributes to the cultural imperialism of other countries. Although the film industry of India, Bollywood has seen astounding success, the monetary supremacy of the U.S. has in many ways proven too difficult of an obstacle to overcome. Consequently, U.S. film is still considered a dominant cultural power affecting countries across the globe. the world.
      We have thoroughly enjoyed contributing to this blog. Through doing this, we have learned how important media literacy is to understanding the different sides of an issue as well as how vital it is to interrupting the agendas of those sides. We encourage the readers of our blog to be willing to be critical of media both in the United States and abroad. 

Tuesday, November 19, 2013

Multiculturalism in Contemporary Italian Film

Since the turn of the century, Italian cinema has emphasized multiculturalism in response to Italy’s growing immigration. This emphasis is much like Hollywood’s contemporary, “token” portrayal of minority groups through which the following occur:

  • Regardless of exposure, the groups are still seen as having levels of exoticism rather than familiarity.
  • This exoticism is largely due to the subtle perpetuation of stereotypes.
  • Stereotypes replace more complex, realistic characters.

To detail Italian cinema’s focus on multiculturalism further, contemporary directors have followed this trend in order to re-think what it means to be an Italian citizen. They have also done this to perpetuate a new kind of national cinema in contrast to the 1990s immigration cinema and other’s film.

Multiculturalism in the new national cinema is aimed at diminishing the otherness of minority groups. However, this does not mean that the spiral of silence is no more. While multiculturalism puts more faces on the screen, the characters present are not necessarily flush, complex personalities; instead, their presences are connotated with exoticism and are portrayed through stereotypes.

Marco Ponti’s 2004 film A/R Andata + Ritorno provides a case study of this through his character Tolstoj. Tolstoj is one of the most pronounced ethnic characters in the movie, but his voice repeatedly lends itself to uttering foreign words of wisdom. This foreignness falls directly in line with Edward Said’s conceptions of Orientalism.

According to Said, the foreigner is exotic and therefore is the other. The stereotype of the other is meant to be a device through which the viewing party can understand the foreigner. In new Italian cinema, the immigrant is stereotyped in order to be better understood. However, this is not a simple meaning-making process. An overly simplistic, often one-sided, representation is cultivated, and it is usually framed to reinforce hegemony.

This kind of representation has long been seen in Hollywood films as well. Taking the recent blockbuster wave as an example, an increasing number of man vs. "other" movies have been produced. Remember Man of SteelOz the Great and PowerfulWorld War Z, and Captain Phillips (to name a few)? Each exalts the heterosexual, white man as the hero who vanquishes the unknown enemy. This gives power to whiteness and those who fall under hegemonic masculinity.

These movies also highlight how political controversy can be portrayed in abstract ways. The U.S. is at war and is paranoid of terrorism, so its culture more readily consumes texts that deal with vanquishing the outside enemy. Similarly, Italy is dealing with immigration, so its cultural products try to connect the audience with that controversy. Furthermore, although Italy and the U.S. have maintained positive relations since 1944, a hypothetical quarrel between the two would also generate cultural products with immediacy. Still, cultural products tell stories that are just as stereotyped as characters. A film's framing of people, places, and situations cannot completely escape cultural contexts.

Sources:

Tuesday, November 5, 2013

Underlying Nationalism in Venezuelan and U.S. Newspapers

       

Although the United States and Venezuela are not considered vicious enemies, the two countries have differing political ideologies and have been known to clash on certain issues.  Recently, the two nations did just that. On September 19th of this year, as Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro was flying to Europe, he was initially denied passage through U.S. airspace over Puerto Rico. Although hasty diplomatic talks granted the President permission, the event caused a stir in Venezuelan newspapers, which cited it as an “act of aggression.” Within a week of the flight, both the New York Times and Correodel Orinoco ran stories regarding the issue. Unsurprisingly, each had its own take on the situation, with both newspapers blaming the opposite country.




            
          In Correo del Orinoco’s September 27 edition, Ewan Robertson writes of the airspace issue, immediately bringing to the reader’s attention that President Maduro and his government were denied permission for no apparent reason. Furthermore, he quotes Bolivarian President Evo Morales as saying that Latin American stands as a "united people," defending the Venezuelan President should anyone such as the United States “‘mess with Maduro.’” Robertson intends to evoke nationalistic emotions among the Venezuelan people, inciting pride for Venezuela and Maduro and anger against the United States.
            
          On the contrary, in the New York Times article titled “U.S. Denies Trying to Bar Venezuelan President From Airspace,” William Neuman highlights that the U.S. never turned down Maduro’s request to fly over their airspace. Rather, Neuman notes that Maduro was not flying in a state department plane and the Venezuelan government only entered the request one day prior to flying, instead of the three days needed. Furthermore, he emphasizes that the issue is of very little significance, only gaining notoriety due to the dramatization of the Venezuelan government and press.


          Yet, these two contrasting articles share common trends. Both articles are in their own way inciting political controversy. Correo del Orinoco is attempting to dramatize the story by painting it as a international travesty of justice, with Venezuela once again being slighted by the arm of the United States. Furthermore, Correo del Orinoco is trying to set an agenda for the Venezuelan government. They want to incite nationalism among the citizens, hoping to ensure that the issue is not soon forgotten. On the other hand, the New York Times is creating political controversy by downplaying the issue in a way that demeans the Venezuela government, calling the issue “absurd.” Although both news sources are attempting to inform their respective readers, neither is completely objective. Rather, both are trying to persuade the public with nationalistic ideals and values. Consequently, this political controversy creates new conceptions of news. Instead of focusing on more pressing issues in both countries, media outlets have prioritized the coverage of issues such as this, dramatizing them for the sake of readers. 


Sources

Venezuelan Article- Ewan Robertson

U.S. Article-William Neuman

Venezuelan Nationalism- Kirschke

Monday, November 4, 2013

Chinese Citizens Develop Online Code Bypassing Censorship

While China’s “Great Firewall” of internet censorship is often criticized as being undemocratic and grossly ubiquitous, there is actually an online code being developed by Chinese citizens that not only bypasses regulators, but creates new conceptions of news and community. This code has created a subtle compromise between the Chinese public and its government – between the people’s need for expression and the government’s need for control.

Xiao Qiang, editor of the
China Digital Times
NPR recently unveiled the reality of the code through an interview with Xiao Qiang, the editor of the China Digital Times. Qiang described the phenomenon as the creation of a “public” code, not a “secret” code. For instance, “May 35” is code for June 4, the day of the 1989 Tiananmen Square massacre, yet the code is commonly understood by both the government and the public to mean just that. It is no secret at all. In fact, the coding is so universal that it is rather not a code at all; it is an online language.

Consequently, political criticism is often present on Chinese servers because it passes through surveillance by being indirect. This indirectness is the compromising factor between the Chinese public and government. As long as the commentary is technically ambiguous, and balancing the fine line, the government does not censor it. Allowing some leniency helps the regime stay in control by letting its citizens express grievances in non-violent ways. Above all, China does not want protests. What is targeted the most under the “Great Firewall” is any text indicating a call to action.

This disrupts traditional methods of community building whereby a mass message about a problem is sent out, and then alike individuals gather together in person to solve it. However, it reversely creates a new version of community building by which people meet on the web to discuss their problems. They even discuss those problems through a new language, which they add on to through the endless interactivity that web communication offers.

The creation of the online community also establishes a news hub which is an alternative to the propaganda inflicted news of the government. Citizens can now perceive two different stories, one of which is given validity by the cultivation of multiple accounts online.

Nevertheless, while NPR provides an insider’s view on Chinese internet regulation, other reports such as an article titled “Crackdown on Bloggers Is Mounted by China” describe a far more restrictive situation. While user-generated opinion is growing more powerful, bloggers still have to be careful as government officials can detain offenders for “malicious rumor-mongering online.” So for now, balancing the fine line may not be as common, or easy, as some testimonies might suggest.

Sources:
Related Sources:

The Power of News Media: "Diplomatic Meltdown" or "Growing Anger"?

You have likely heard all about the Edward Snowden/National Security Agency (NSA) leak scandal that has been prominent across many media outlets since Snowden’s first “leak” in June of 2013.

Get an overview on Edward Snowden, former U.S. NSA employee, here.

The global coverage continues today with media outlets (TVradionewspaper) confronting the leaked information about secret CIA and NSA operations in different ways. 

Most recent scandal: The NSA likely surveilled German Chancellor Angela Merkel's private communications. (Information revealed by Snowden, of course. And yes, this means tapping the Chancellor's personal cell phone.)

This article will compare United States' and Germany's newspaper coverage of this issue.

See the Abendzeitung Munich: "Diplomatic Meltdown."


See the New York Times: "Anger Growing Among Allies on U.S. Spying."

Trends to notice:
  • Political Controversy: Like I said in my last post, controversy, especially on this global scale, means interesting content. Interest equals profit for media companies.
    • Newspapers worldwide covered this material.
  • Demassification: Both newspapers emphasized specific information that was relevant to their audience. 
    • For example, each paper published it in their country's respective language.
  • Media Purposes:
    • Community building
      • Other articles in the German press suggest tips to make sure you, a potential NSA target, aren't being surveilled. These articles create a community through country-wide shock and outrage.
Abendzeitung Munich headlines concerning the NSA scandal.
    • Inform & entertain
      • Because it's political controversy, these stories are newsworthy (selected because they are deemed important by gatekeepers) as well as interesting.
      • Both articles are serious and informative, but as seen above, Abendzeitung Munich posted more creative articles like, "How to make life difficult for the NSA."
  • Effects:
    • Framing
      • What the NY Times calls a "diplomatic challenge," Abendzeitung Munich calls "completely unacceptable."
      • Each paper explains the same event in a different way, giving their audiences a different frame of understanding from which to draw conclusions.
    • Agenda-setting
      • Media decide what their audience is aware of. By covering and dramatizing this event, these papers force the controversy to the front of knowledge.
It is critical to note media's huge function in our lives, especially when considering powerful news sources. Without proper consideration, media can decide what we, their audience, thinks about. You must be aware of media motives and trends to be an informed citizen. Simply relying on articles in your favorite newspaper is no longer enough.


Check out the full sources for more info.



Monday, October 28, 2013

Coca-Col-ization: How Coca-Cola Advertising Embodies Glocalization

Yes, you read it right.

Glocalization is a more precise term for the its well-known counterpart, globalization. Before discussing its use in Coca-Cola's advertising, there's a distinction to understand:

  
   






A perfect example of a company harnessing glocalization to advertise to a huge, diverse audience is The Coca-Cola Company.


Check out this Coca-Cola advertisement from their Happiness Without Borders campaign:

by The Coca-Cola Company

The video exemplifies both specific trends of effective mass communication and the social process glocalization.

Mass Communication Trends & Effects:                                                               
  • Political controversy
    • Audiences like conflict. It’s interesting.
    • Here, the ad portrays Coca-Cola as a global product that may solve tension between India and Pakistan. 
  • Agenda-setting
    • The media’s ability to influence what publics think about
    • In this case, shedding light on the conflict.
  • CNN Effect
    • The ability, through emotional video, to elevate distant issues on the domestic public agenda
    • Because of the footage in the ad, viewers worldwide feel sympathetic and action-minded toward the situation.


Glocalization:
  • By placing the "Small World Machine" in a rural environment, the technology is exciting and novel. So, Coke extends that global image in a local setting. 
  • The theme of the video also corresponds with Coca-Cola's ad campaign: "Open Happiness."
Final five seconds of "Coca-Cola Small World Machines"


While Coca-Cola narrowed the content to fit local groups, their "happy" brand remains potent. From individuals drinking Cokes and laughing to the final slogan, neither the American brand nor the locals completely conformed to the other's culture. 

Instead, Coca-Cola combined the local culture with its global trademark and created a perfect example of glocalization in mass communication. 



Check out the full sources for more info.